Anyway.
From what I am discovering the MC controller is supposed to have 50 amp shunt in it so you can run the MC software at 48v with the right current settings.
I put in one shunt I need to go to 36v setting but turn max amps up. If I add two shunts I need to keep the high max amps but go up to the 48v setting.
If I use three 10 amp shunts I guess I can set the max amps down then. To some degree the
BMS in the ping
BMS is already adding some and allows around 75A peak.
Before the shunt mod the bike was sluggish and the figures I put into the software is not eve close to what I am getting but the more I unrestrict the current the more the software becomes calibrated and useful.
What point of LVC if you need to set the controller at 24v or even REGEN with an full range duty cycle capability happening and a 20 amp bottle neck stuck in before it, is definitely one reason why these controllers are failing.
Hey I'll even be tempted to try regen when the controller wont allow a larger v drop between the battery and fet side of the shunt.
With all this new found power I need to keep sight on my battery capabilities and also what amps can the coils take inside the motor. The best I should allow is 25 amps max for my battery sake.
But I want all the amps from take off. Where the resistive shunt is taking all of the power away at high load times a 50 amp shunt should certainly liven things up.
The software controls are good to use for current limitation as it is more efficient to use switching, and switching methods of current control does not prejudice due to resistance but rather lowers the effect of resistance by use of pulse technology.
It will be tomorrow I will get some gear and make the internal controller external with a big fat hunky heat sink on my fets and a 50 amps worth of shunt in place and see if I can control this thing with the software alone.