Dennis, I think being multi-lingual both literally and figuratively with respect to measurement is a really good thing. I wish I would have studied another language more seriously. In the real world, while I would love to deal only with SI measurements, I also have SAE tools in my shop and at my job. I have to, because that's the way things are - especially dealing with older vehicles as I sometimes do. As Gary said - everything is easier to estimate in the units that we're comfortable with (I still estimate in gallons, feet, etc). But, if you can start when you're little (like I try to do with my kids), you can be bilingual. You can "think" in other languages. A
GOOD thing.
I think the best argument for a universal "language" for measurement is the reduced chance for error in conversion or "translation" as it were. Surely we've all heard the phrase "lost in translation". Mistakes happen, and it costs money. See the famous NASA metric mixup
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter#Cause_of_failureIf for no other reason, simple calculations within the SI measurement system are ridiculously easy. It all makes sense because it's designed to make sense. I'm just an idiot, but talk to someone who deals with the math of SI every day, and I think they will give you similar reasoning.
In the end, if we can all become proficiently "bi-lingual", the best system will prevail given the chance to do so. Logically speaking, the internationally standardized system WILL prevail, and when it does? I don't want my kids only knowing how to speak a dead language while everyone else is collaborating and doing inter-galactic super rocket surgery studies.

You're professor was right about the hammer; we need all the tools.