Here is another fet that could work.
IRFP2907
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfp2907.pdfYou can get 10 here for $39.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/10-pcs-IRFP2907-IRFP-2907-IR-Power-MOSFET-N-Channel-/370401488583?cmd=ViewItem&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item563da62ec7Not cheap. But looking at the datasheet they seem to perform better under hot conditions than the IRFB3207ZPBF.
The amps are limted by the package at around 90 amps but its silicon limit is 204 amps.
Its R
DS(on) is 4.7mO
Its turn on delay is low at 23ns this to me gives a good reason why we should forgive its rise time at 190ns and off and fall time at 130ns under a lab load of 204 amps. How it would perform under a lighter load with a good hair trigger is obvious with its on resistance of 4.7mO
I did up a comparison of the datasheet with current and temp coefficiency.
And I thought I add the GM STB140NF75 fet in green.
The STB140NF75 comes ahead of the IRFB3207ZPBF.in the Pie current area.
The IRFB3207ZPBF is King of the 90 and 120 amp range,
Where as the IRFP2907 is the all round performer hands down under 90 amps.
I marked in yellow the current capability advantages of the IRFB3207ZPBF over the IRFP2907 and thermal advatages of the IRFB3207ZPBF has over the STB140NF75
I marked in blue the advatages of the STB140NF75 thermal advatage over the IRFB3207ZPBF.
And I marked in blue-green the thermal advantages advantages of the IRFP2907
Please excuse any inaccuracies towards the STB140NF75 as the temperature scale was hard to blen I just did a few plots and jouined the dots.
One thing that stood out is the STB140NF75 could do 100 amps at 100
oC. and possibly that the internal controller are not too up to modding current shunts to max without some special considerations to the parts used.
The IRFP2907 can give up 50 more amps at 150
oc Thats still 90 amps at 150
oc compared to 40 amps the IRFB3207ZPBF at the same temperature. This to me shows that the IRFB3207ZPBF struggles under high temperature conditions and suffers more from thremal runaway..
The IRFP2907 can still run a 30 amp MP at 170
oc where as the IRFB3207ZPBF is lucky to provide 5 amps at this temperature.
The package isnt a T0-220 with bare metal exposed and probably has less chance of picking up thermals in the motor and bringing heat close to the dye.
I could be wrong and the IRFP2907 package does seem less atractive on the graph at higher current draw due to the package limitation, IMHO the IRFP2907 will out perform the IRFB3207ZPBF with the internal controller application with the MP.
Maybe these findings should be something for GM to look into in the future and maybe something we only think about for now. A fet like this would bring up the price of the controller in the MP wheel $30 or so but may just be worth the additional expense when considering an internal controller.